Sunday, November 5, 2017

WMGR -Key Note

Fourth “B. G. Walimbe Memorial Lecture”
Institution of Engineers, Pune, 4th Nov 2017
Water Management, Governance & Regulation in Maharashtra
Issues & Remedial Measures
Pradeep Purandare 1

Introduction:
 Water Management, Governance & Regulation (WMGR) is a vast subject. Any serious & in-depth discussion about WMGR should, therefore, ideally cover Surface as well as Ground Water, all types of Water Resources Development, Competitive Uses of Water, Inter-disciplinary linkages of all above and associated techno-socio-economic-legal-environmental aspects. However, the scope of this presentation is limited to Surface Water, State Sector Irrigation Projects, Irrigation and Techno – Legal aspects
     
Water Management:
In view of 3679 number of projects, 50 L ha irrigation potential & 34000 Mcum water use, it is clear that the system to be managed & governed is huge. WMGR of such a huge system is difficult. It becomes all the more challenging when supply of water for irrigation & non irrigation purposes from a common source is to be given as per the legal provisions regarding Entitlements & Volumetric Supply in MWRRA & MMISF Acts. Such a water management obviously demands certain basic things.
Pre - requisites: 
1.    Compatible physical system to keep system parameters close to their assumed values, to control & regulate water-level & discharge  and  to facilitate Volumetric Supply & Water Accounting / Auditing
2.    Implementation of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to keep the management streamlined & alert
3.     Robust Institutional & Legal Arrangements (ILA) for implementing Water Laws & resolve Water Conflicts i.e. Water Governance
 Present Status:
Water management of such a quality & standard is conspicuous by its absence in Maharashtra because –
1.  Physical system is not amenable to legally accepted modern concepts  
2.  SOPs are not implemented  &
3.  Institutional & Legal Arrangements are too weak to facilitate desired water governance
Necessary details are given in following paragraphs   
  Lack of Timely & Adequate Maintenance & Repairs:
   Lack of systemic & systematic M&R has taken its toll. Following is evident in canals &    
   DISNET of almost all projects
1.    Actual carrying capacity is significantly less than design capacity
2.    Actual conveyance losses are far more than generally expected ones. Actual  Overall Project Efficiency is hardly 20-25 % as against the assumption of 45-50%
3.    Less carrying capacity & more losses make mockery of irrigation schedules
4.    Most of the Head Regulator (HR) & Cross Regulator (CR) gates and Measuring Devices are out of order or missing
5.    Water-Level & Discharge Regulation and Water Measurement is not possible
6.    Inordinate delays & grossly inadequate water supply lead to water conflicts
It is, therefore, necessary to go to basics, revisit the basic concepts, solve the administrative / management problems, evolve effective maintenance strategies, diagnose common problems, scrupulously follow forgotten technical circulars & address the maintenance problem urgently & in upfront manner. There is no substitute for M & R!
Functional HR & CR Gates:
HR & CR gates are cumbersome to operate. Their manual operation limits flexibility of canal operation. Absence of real time data of water- level & discharge makes the situation more complex. The end result is there is no water-level & discharge control. Volumetric Supply of water becomes practically impossible. The possible solutions could be as follows to remedy the situation.
1.       Provide motorized HR & CR gates
2.       Create Special Gates M & R Mobile Units
OR
3.       Replace conventional HR gates by Distributors
4.       Replace  conventional CR gates in main canal   by automatic gates & that in distributaries by  Duckbill or Diagonal weirs
5.       Introduce Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) on main canals of major projects to start with.
6.       Go for a “proper mix” of above  solutions together
 It would not be out of place to recall that Sir Vishvesharayya had developed automatic gates.
 Functional Measuring devices:
The situation regarding measuring devices on canals & DISNET in almost all projects is frustrating to say the least. They are not provided / constructed, in the first place, at the head of all canals & DISNET. If at all there are measuring devices, it is quite likely that they may be suffering from common problems, namely, wrong design, improper location, defective construction, poor M &R and unreliable records. Following solutions are available to improve the situation.
1.      Provide measuring devices on large scale & do flow measurement    OR
2.      Switch over to indirect measurement of water.  Requirement of measuring devices can be reduced if conventional HR gates are replaced by Distributors. These structures release known & constant discharge. Volume can be obtained only by measuring the time for which that discharge is given.
3.      Go for a “proper mix” of above 2 solutions together             
Industrial production:
Industrial production of HR & CR gates, duckbill weirs, measuring devices & water meters and provision, installation, maintenance, repairs, calibration, automatic data collection, etc could be a huge business opportunity. Implement systemic & systematic plans for the same
Implementation of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
 Following Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are not being scrupulously followed with adequate technical inputs in most of the projects. Degree of negligence regarding SOPs increases as the project size decreases
1.      Preliminary Irrigation Program
2.      Canal scheduling
3.      Monitoring, Measurement & Accounting of water
4.      Water Auditing
5.      Benchmarking
6.      Irrigation Status Report
7.      TAP - C principles:
 It is high time to insist for implementation of SOPs & thereby, increase technical input & bring in an element of science in water management. Follow the process & results will follow!

 Water Governance:
 Non-implementation of Water Laws has weakened the present Institutional & Legal Arrangements (ILA):    
 Acts in force:
 Following nine irrigation related Acts are in force simultaneously in the State.
1.      Maharashtra Irrigation Act (MIA) 1976
2.      Irrigation Development Corporations (IDC)  Acts 1996 – 1998 [Total 5 Acts]
3.      Maharashtra Management of Irrigation System by the Farmers (MMISF) Act 2005
4.      Maharashtra Water resources Regulatory Authority (MWRRA) Act 2005
5.      Maharashtra  Ground Water ( Development & Management) Act, 2009 (MGW)
Barring the exception of MGW Act, all other Acts are based on MIA & refer to the same as MIA is the Parent Act.
Rules of the Acts:
It needs to be seriously noted that barring the exception of MMISF Act, all other Acts don’t have rules. In the case of MIA76, old rules, namely, Bombay Canal Rules 1934 based on Bombay Irrigation Act 1879 are being followed when BIA1879 has been repealed by MIA76
Acts state general principles. Rules provide details required for implementation of the Act. Rules include empowerment of officials, prescribed procedures, time limits, forms to be used, etc. Rules are thus inseparable from the Act. Act & Rules together is an “Adwait”! ILA without Rules literally means a body without soul.
Why MIA is a Parent Act?
It is MIA that provides for basic foundation & frame work of the Water Management & Governance in the State through following provisions.

Sec.
Provision
Purpose
11
River Notification
To provide WRD locus standi for WMGR
3
Command Notification.
5
Division of State into irrigation areas
To provide administrative structure to WM  GR
8
Appointment of Canal Officers.
(for implementation of the Act)
To appoint officers & fix their respective jurisdictions

Since, MIA is a parent Act, the Canal Officers appointed & empowered under MIA are only supposed to implement IDC, MMISF & MWRRA Acts.
Appointment & Empowerment of Canal Officers as per MIA 76
It appears, prima facie, that Canal Officers have not been duly appointed & empowered. The same should be done as per steps given below
1.         Revise division of State into irrigation areas (u/s 5) 
2.         Issue Notification of Section, Sub division, Division, Circle, Region u/s 8 to legally define the jurisdiction of all Canal Officers at various levels.
3.         Issue order as per as per Sec 2(4) & 6
4.         Allot duties as per Sec 10
5.          Delegate powers as per Sec 110.
River & Command Notifications under MIA:
Notifications pertaining to rivers & command areas under MIA are also important as they provide
1.          Necessary legal locus standi to WRD for carrying out WMGR.
2.         Prior intimation to water users that provisions of MIA would henceforth be applied in the notified command areas & give them opportunity of being heard (This is the first step of the process of PIM)
3.         Assurance that water would be used for the purpose mentioned in the notification. This is the first step in the direction of issuing Water Use Entitlements.
 Notification for Lift Irrigation Water Users Associations:
Area & water use of Lift Irrigation Schemes is increasing at an alarming rate. But LIS remains virtually unregulated because necessary notifications u/s 116 of MIA and u/s 39 of MMISF Act have not been issued since 41 years & 12 years respectively.

Water Regulation:
It is necessary to take a critical review of MWRRA which is the first ever Quasi Judicial Independent Regulatory Authority (IRA) in India’s water sector.  It’s time to identify & remove weaknesses & further strengthen the IRA in the larger interests of the State in general & water sector in particular.  MWRRA should become a custodian of water laws & ILA.
 Provisions regarding Water Governance in MWRRA Act:
The MWRRA Act, 2005 has made following very important & useful provisions for creating a solid & robust frame work for ILA & Water Governance in the State:

SN
Sec
Provision
Purpose
1
2 (1) (u)
Definition of River basin Agency (RBAs)
To establish RBAs to give the Water Entitlements
2
14
Permission of RBA
To authorize the water use in the State
3
15
State Water Board
To prepare a draft Integrated State Water Plan (ISWP)
4
16
State Water Council
To approve the draft ISWP submitted by the State Water Board.
5
11 (f)
to review & clear water resources projects in conformity with ISWP
To develop & manage water resources in the State in systematic, systemic & river basin-wise manner.
6
13
Powers of Authority & Dispute Resolution Officer
To resolve water conflicts
7
22
Disputes & Appeals
To resolve water conflicts

 MWRRA working in vacuum:
MWRRA is working literally in vacuum; thanks to the absence of Rules, RBAs, fully operational SWB & SWC and ISWP 
 Powers not used:
Though MWRRA has “powers as are vested in a civil court, under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908”, it could hardly exercise its following powers as a quasi judicial authority.
1.           Powers of Authority and Dispute Resolution Officer u/s 13:
2.         Disputes & Appeals u/s 22:
3.         Punishment for non-compliance of orders u/s 26
4.         Offences by companies u/s 27
5.         Compounding of offences u/s 28
6.         Cognizance of offences u/s 29.
  Duties not performed:
  As a result, MWRRA could not do anything in respect of following in last 12 years
1.           State Water Entitlement data base [11 (s)]
2.          Hydro-meteorological information data base [11(t)]
3.         Irrigation Status Report [11 (v)]
4.         Preservation of water quality [12(5)]
5.         Private LIS [12(6)(d), (e)]
6.         Water to drought prone areas [12 (10) (a)]
 Way ahead:
 water Management
1. Give more emphasis on Demand Side Management
       2. Acknowledge importance of WMGR & act accordingly
3. Create separate cadre for water management
       4. Take up special time bound program for Canal Maintenance
5.  Modernize canal systems to facilitate water- level & discharge regulation and   
     water measurement. Introduce canal automation.
 6. Initiate industrial production of HR & CR Gates & Measuring Devices
7. Ensure implementation of Standard Operating Procedures.  
 WATER GOVERNANCE
1.    Complete operative part of Irrigation Acts ( Rules, notifications, appointments & empowerment of canal officers, agreements, etc) in time bound manner
2.    Ensure that  Chief Engineers would act as Chief Controlling Authority as per Sec 7 of MIA76
WATER REGULATION
1.    Establish River Basin Agencies
2.    Prepare & implement Integrated State Water Plan
3.    Amend MWRRA Act.
4.    Restructure MWRRA.

****

1.       Former Associate Professor, WALMI, Aurangabad.  Expert Member, Marathwada Statutory Development Board,  Expert Member, Integrated State Water Plan Committee
              M: 9822565232, 02402970358   pradeeppurandare@gmail.com
             

















No comments:

Post a Comment